What to Do When Police Refuse to Register Your FIR

Complete Legal Guide Under BNSS 2023 and BNS 2023 with FIR and Magistrate complaint templates

By Advocate (Dr.) Prashant Mali
Expert in Criminal Law for Cyber Crimes, Online frauds, Data Theft, online defamation & EOW crimes

πŸ“š Practice Areas: Criminal Law, Cyber Crime, DPDPA, Constitutional Rights, FIR Registration
⏱️ Reading Time: 15-18 minutes
πŸ“… Last Updated: November 2025
βš–οΈ Applicable Laws: BNSS 2023, BNS 2023, BSA 2023
⚠️ Critical Information: On July 1, 2024, India's criminal justice system underwent a historic transformation with the implementation of three new laws: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023, and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) 2023, replacing the IPC, CrPC, and Indian Evidence Act respectively. This guide addresses FIR registration rights under the new legal framework.

πŸ“‹ Table of Contents

1. Introduction: Understanding FIR and Its Importance

A First Information Report, commonly known as FIR, is the foundational legal document that sets the criminal justice machinery in motion. It represents the first formal intimation received by law enforcement about the commission of a cognizable offence. The FIR is not merely a procedural formality; it is a constitutional right that empowers citizens to seek justice and ensures that the rule of law prevails.

Under the new Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023, which replaced the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) on July 1, 2024, the provisions relating to FIR registration have been modernized while retaining the core principles of accessibility and mandatory registration for cognizable offences.

πŸ“– Definition: A First Information Report (FIR) is the written document prepared by police officers receiving information about the commission of a cognizable offence as per Section 173 of BNSS 2023. It is a crucial document that initiates the investigation process and serves as the foundation for criminal proceedings.

Why Is FIR Registration Critical?

3. Cognizable vs Non-Cognizable Offences Under BNS 2023

Understanding the distinction between cognizable and non-cognizable offences is fundamental to knowing whether an FIR can be registered or whether a different legal remedy must be pursued. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023, which replaced the Indian Penal Code on July 1, 2024, classifies offences into these categories.

What Are Cognizable Offences?

Cognizable offences are serious crimes where police have the authority to arrest the accused without a warrant and commence investigation without requiring permission from any court. These offences are generally punishable with imprisonment of three years or more.

πŸ” Cognizable Offence Characteristics:
  • Police can arrest without warrant
  • Police can start investigation without Magistrate's permission
  • FIR must be registered under Section 173 BNSS 2023
  • Generally non-bailable offences
  • More serious in nature with significant punishment

Examples of Cognizable Offences Under BNS 2023

Offence Category BNS 2023 Section Description
Murder Section 103 Causing death with intention or knowledge that act is likely to cause death
Rape Section 63-70 Sexual offences against women
Kidnapping Section 137-140 Abducting or unlawfully detaining any person
Robbery Section 309-311 Theft with violence or threat of violence
Dacoity Section 310 Robbery committed by five or more persons
Dowry Death Section 80 Death of woman within seven years of marriage under abnormal circumstances
Cheating Section 318-320 Fraudulent or dishonest inducement to deliver property
Criminal Breach of Trust Section 316-317 Dishonest misappropriation of entrusted property
Assault on Women Section 74-79 Various offences against women with intent to outrage modesty

What Are Non-Cognizable Offences?

Non-cognizable offences are less serious crimes where police cannot arrest without a warrant and cannot commence investigation without obtaining permission from a Judicial Magistrate. For these offences, an FIR cannot be registered; instead, a complaint must be filed before the Magistrate.

πŸ“ Non-Cognizable Offence Characteristics:
  • Police cannot arrest without warrant
  • Police need Magistrate's permission to investigate
  • FIR cannot be registered; complaint must be filed in court
  • Generally bailable offences
  • Less serious in nature with lesser punishment (typically under 3 years)

Examples of Non-Cognizable Offences Under BNS 2023

The First Schedule: Classification Authority

The First Schedule of the BNSS 2023 (corresponding to Schedule I of the old CrPC) provides a comprehensive classification of offences as cognizable or non-cognizable. This schedule must be consulted to determine the nature of the offence and the appropriate legal remedy.

4. Who Can Register an FIR?

One of the most empowering aspects of Indian criminal law is that FIR registration is not restricted to victims alone. The law recognizes that crimes affect society as a whole, and therefore, provides broad standing for FIR registration.

Categories of Persons Who Can Register FIR

βœ“ Persons Entitled to Register FIR:

  • The Victim: The person who has suffered loss, injury, or damage due to the cognizable offence has the primary right to register an FIR.
  • Family Members or Relatives: In cases where the victim is unable to lodge FIR (due to injury, trauma, minor age, etc.), family members can register the complaint.
  • Eyewitnesses: Any person who has witnessed the commission of a cognizable offence can lodge an FIR, even if they are not directly affected.
  • Any Citizen with Knowledge: Any person who has credible knowledge or information about the commission of a cognizable offence can approach police to register FIR.
  • Social Organizations and NGOs: In cases involving public interest, especially crimes against vulnerable sections, social organizations can file FIR.
  • Police Officers: Based on their own knowledge or information received during duty, police officers can register FIR suo moto.
  • Anonymous Complaints: While generally discouraged, anonymous complaints can form the basis of FIR if they provide credible information about serious cognizable offences.

Mode of Giving Information

Section 173(1) of BNSS 2023 explicitly provides for two modes of giving information:

  1. Oral Information: The informant can orally narrate the facts to the officer in charge of the police station, who must reduce it to writing, read it back to the informant, and obtain the informant's signature.
  2. Written Information: The informant can submit a written complaint, which must be accepted and registered by the police station.
🌐 Digital Age Advancement: BNSS 2023 has modernized FIR registration by recognizing electronic filing. Many states now provide online FIR registration portals for certain categories of offences, particularly cyber crimes and property-related offences. The complainant's digital signature is accepted as valid under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) 2023.

Territorial Jurisdiction

While an FIR should ideally be registered at the police station having territorial jurisdiction over the place where the offence occurred, the Supreme Court has clarified in multiple judgments that if a person approaches a police station outside the jurisdiction, the police must still record the information and forward it to the concerned police station. Refusal on grounds of jurisdiction is not permissible.

5. When Police Must Register FIR

The landmark judgment of the Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh (2014) established unequivocally that registration of FIR is mandatory once information about a cognizable offence is received. This principle has been carried forward and strengthened under BNSS 2023.

βš–οΈ Mandatory Registration Rule: Police officers have NO discretion in registering an FIR when information about a cognizable offence is received. The use of the word "shall" in Section 173(1) BNSS makes registration mandatory and non-discretionary. Any refusal to register FIR amounts to a violation of statutory duty.

The Lalita Kumari Principle

The Supreme Court in the Lalita Kumari case laid down the following principles that continue to apply under BNSS 2023:

Exceptions to Immediate FIR Registration

The Supreme Court recognized limited exceptions where preliminary inquiry may be conducted before FIR registration:

Exception Category Description Reason for Exception
Matrimonial Disputes Allegations arising from marital conflicts Often involve family settlement possibilities; require verification to prevent misuse
Commercial Offences Business disputes with criminal allegations May involve complex commercial transactions requiring preliminary examination
Medical Negligence Allegations against medical professionals Requires expert opinion to determine if negligence amounts to criminal offence
Corruption Cases Allegations under Prevention of Corruption Act Requires preliminary verification and prior approval from competent authority
Cases Requiring Expert Opinion Technical matters needing specialist assessment Initial inquiry needed to determine if cognizable offence exists
⚠️ Important Note: Even in exception categories, if the information clearly discloses commission of a cognizable offence, FIR must be registered immediately. Preliminary inquiry cannot be used as a tool to avoid FIR registration. The inquiry must be completed within seven days in such cases.

6. What to Do When Police Refuse FIR Registration

Despite clear legal mandates, instances of police refusing to register FIR remain a practical challenge faced by citizens. Understanding your rights and the legal remedies available is crucial to ensuring justice is not denied.

Common Reasons Why Police Refuse FIR

🚫 Know Your Rights: Police cannot refuse to register FIR on grounds of jurisdiction, lack of evidence, or pending inquiry. The law mandates immediate registration upon receipt of information about cognizable offence. Any refusal is illegal and actionable.

Immediate Steps When Police Refuse to Register FIR

Step-by-Step Action Plan:

Submit Written Complaint
Always submit your complaint in writing. If police refuse to accept written complaint, send it via registered post with acknowledgment due to the Station House Officer (SHO). Keep copies of all documents.
Request Written Refusal
Ask the police officer to provide written reasons for refusing to register FIR. This creates documentary evidence of refusal and can be used in subsequent legal proceedings.
Note Details of Refusal
Record the name, designation, and badge number of the officer who refused FIR registration. Note the date, time, and exact reasons given for refusal.
Escalate to Senior Officers
Contact the Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP) or Superintendent of Police (SP) of the district. Many police departments have dedicated helplines for FIR registration complaints.
Use Official Complaint Mechanisms
File complaint through official channels such as police helplines (100), state police websites, grievance portals, or citizen apps provided by police departments.
Legal Remedies
If administrative remedies fail, pursue legal options under Section 175(3) BNSS (complaint to SP) or approach the Judicial Magistrate under Section 177(3) BNSS.

7. Complaint to Superintendent of Police: Section 175(3) BNSS

Section 175(3) of BNSS 2023 (corresponding to Section 154(3) of the old CrPC) provides the first statutory remedy when police refuse to register an FIR. This provision empowers aggrieved persons to directly approach the Superintendent of Police.

Section 175(3) of BNSS 2023

"Any person aggrieved by a refusal on the part of an officer in charge of a police station to record the information referred to in sub-section (1) may send the substance of such information, in writing and by post, to the Superintendent of Police concerned who, if satisfied that such information discloses the commission of a cognizable offence, shall either investigate the case himself or direct an investigation to be made by any police officer subordinate to him, in the manner provided by this Sanhita, and such officer shall have all the powers of an officer in charge of the police station in relation to that offence."

How to File Complaint Under Section 175(3) BNSS

βœ“ Essential Requirements:

  • Written Complaint: The complaint must be in writing containing the substance of information about the cognizable offence
  • Details of Refusal: Mention when, where, and by whom the FIR registration was refused
  • Mode of Submission: Can be sent by post (registered/speed post recommended) or submitted personally at SP office
  • Complete Facts: Include all material facts, chronology of events, and nature of cognizable offence
  • Supporting Documents: Attach any available evidence, receipts, communications, or proof of complaint made to police station
  • Contact Information: Provide complete contact details including address, phone number, and email

Format for Complaint to Superintendent of Police

Sample Complaint Template

To,
The Superintendent of Police,
[District Name]
[State]

Date: [Date]

Subject: Complaint under Section 175(3) BNSS, 2023 regarding refusal to register FIR

Respected Sir/Madam,

I, [Your Name], resident of [Your Address], hereby lodge this complaint under Section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, against the refusal of [Police Station Name] to register my FIR.

BRIEF FACTS:
1. On [Date], at approximately [Time], the following cognizable offence occurred: [Brief description of offence]
2. The offence falls under Section(s) [mention BNS sections] of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. I approached [Police Station Name] on [Date] to register FIR.
4. [Officer Name, if known], officer in charge/duty officer, refused to register FIR on the ground that [mention reason given].
5. Despite repeated requests and submission of written complaint on [Date], no FIR has been registered.

COGNIZABLE OFFENCE DETAILS:
[Provide detailed description of the cognizable offence, including who, what, when, where, and how]

RELIEF SOUGHT:
I request your good office to kindly direct registration of FIR and investigation into the matter as per law.

Enclosures:
1. Copy of written complaint submitted to police station
2. [Any other supporting documents]

Yours faithfully,
[Signature]
[Name]
[Contact Number]
[Email Address]
                

Powers of Superintendent of Police

Upon receiving complaint under Section 175(3), the Superintendent of Police has the following powers:

⏱️ Time Frame: While BNSS 2023 does not specify a time limit for SP to act on complaints under Section 175(3), in practice, most SPs are expected to respond within 7-15 days. If no action is taken within reasonable time, the next remedy is to approach the Judicial Magistrate under Section 177(3) BNSS.

8. Complaint to Judicial Magistrate: Section 175(3) & 177 BNSS

If the complaint to the Superintendent of Police does not yield results, or if the complainant wishes to directly approach the judiciary, Section 177(3) of BNSS 2023 provides a powerful remedy. This provision allows the aggrieved person to approach the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) or Metropolitan Magistrate (MM) for directions to police to register FIR and investigate.

Section 177(3) of BNSS 2023

"Any Magistrate, whether or not having jurisdiction in the case, may order such an investigation as mentioned in sub-section (1) or such inquiry as mentioned in sub-section (2)."

Read with Section 177(1): "Any Magistrate empowered under Section 176 or on receipt of a complaint of facts which constitute such offence may direct an investigation to be made by a police officer or by such other person as he thinks fit, for the purpose of deciding whether or not there is sufficient ground for proceeding."

Legal Basis for Magistrate's Intervention

The power of the Magistrate to direct police investigation is derived from two key provisions:

This judicial remedy is particularly powerful because:

  1. It brings judicial oversight to police inaction
  2. Magistrate's order is binding on police
  3. Non-compliance can lead to contempt proceedings
  4. It protects citizens' constitutional right to access justice

Landmark Supreme Court Judgments

Priyanka Srivastava v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2015)

AIR 2015 SC 1490

Key Principles Established:

  • The power under Section 156(3) CrPC [now Section 177(3) BNSS] can be exercised even before cognizance is taken
  • Magistrate should ordinarily conduct inquiry to ascertain if the allegations prima facie constitute cognizable offence
  • Mechanical exercise of power should be avoided
  • The application should contain sufficient details about the alleged offence
  • The Magistrate should apply judicial mind before directing investigation

Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh (2014)

AIR 2014 SC 187

Key Holdings:

  • Registration of FIR is mandatory if information discloses commission of cognizable offence
  • No preliminary inquiry is permissible in most cases
  • Police officer cannot refuse to register FIR on flimsy grounds
  • Limited exceptions exist for specific categories of cases
  • Refusal to register FIR violates Rule of Law

Procedure Before the Magistrate

Filing Complaint Under Section 177(3) BNSS:

Draft Comprehensive Complaint
Prepare detailed complaint stating all facts, chronology, cognizable offence committed, police refusal details, and applicable BNS sections. Include specific prayer for direction to police to register FIR and investigate.
File Before Appropriate Magistrate
File complaint before JMFC/MM having territorial jurisdiction. In metropolitan areas, file before Metropolitan Magistrate. In other areas, file before Judicial Magistrate First Class.
Court Fee and Filing
Pay prescribed court fee (usually nominal). Some states provide exemption from court fee for FIR-related complaints. Submit complaint in court office with required copies.
Magistrate's Initial Scrutiny
Magistrate examines complaint to determine if it prima facie discloses cognizable offence. May seek clarifications or additional information from complainant.
Hearing and Orders
Magistrate may conduct brief hearing. If satisfied, issues directions to concerned police station to register FIR and investigate. Order specifies police officer responsible and time frame.
Compliance and Follow-up
Police must comply with Magistrate's order. Magistrate may direct submission of Action Taken Report (ATR). Non-compliance can be raised before Magistrate for further action.

9. Essential Elements of Complaint Under Section 177(3) BNSS

A well-drafted complaint under Section 177(3) BNSS significantly increases the likelihood of favorable judicial intervention. The complaint should be comprehensive, legally sound, and factually accurate.

Critical Components of the Complaint

βœ“ Essential Elements Checklist:

  • Title and Court Details: Properly address complaint to jurisdictionally appropriate Magistrate
  • Compliance with Section 173(1) BNSS: State that information was given to police for registration of FIR under Section 173(1)
  • Details of Police Refusal: Specify date, time, police station, and officer who refused FIR registration
  • Complaint to SP under Section 175(3): If applicable, mention that complaint was made to Superintendent of Police and outcome
  • Memo of Parties: Complete details of complainant, accused (if known), and relevant witnesses
  • Statement of Cognizable Offence: Detailed narration of facts constituting cognizable offence under BNS 2023
  • Applicable BNS Sections: Specific sections of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 under which offence is committed
  • Jurisdiction Compliance: Establish territorial and pecuniary jurisdiction of the Magistrate
  • Prayer Clause: Specific relief sought - direction to police to register FIR and investigate
  • Verification: Proper verification as per law with complainant's signature
  • Annexures: All supporting documents numbered and attached
  • Electronic Evidence Compliance: Certificate under Section 63 of BSA 2023 for any electronic evidence
  • List of Witnesses: Names and addresses of material witnesses

Detailed Complaint Format

Comprehensive Complaint Template Under Section 177(3) BNSS, 2023

IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS
[District Name], [State]

COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 177(3) READ WITH SECTION 176
OF THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023

Complaint No.: _________ of 20___

IN THE MATTER OF:

[Complainant Name]
Son/Daughter of [Father's Name]
Aged [Age] years
Resident of [Complete Address]
                                                        ... Complainant

Versus

[Accused Name, if known]
Son/Daughter of [Father's Name]
Resident of [Address, if known]
                                                        ... Accused

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. JURISDICTION:
   That this Hon'ble Court has territorial jurisdiction to entertain and try the present complaint as the cognizable offence was committed within the jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court at [Place]. This Hon'ble Court also has pecuniary jurisdiction in the matter.

2. COMPLAINANT'S DETAILS:
   That the complainant is a law-abiding citizen of India and is competent to file the present complaint.

3. BRIEF FACTS:
   That on [Date], at approximately [Time], at [Place], the following incident occurred:
   [Detailed narration of facts - who, what, when, where, how]

4. COGNIZABLE OFFENCE COMMITTED:
   That the above facts constitute cognizable offence punishable under Section(s) [mention specific BNS sections] of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The said offence is cognizable as per First Schedule of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 173(1) BNSS:
   That on [Date], the complainant approached [Police Station Name] to register First Information Report (FIR) under Section 173 of BNSS, 2023.

6. REFUSAL BY POLICE:
   That [Officer Name/Designation], the officer in charge/on duty, refused to register the FIR on the ground that [mention specific reason given].
   
   That despite repeated requests on [dates], the police have failed and/or refused to register FIR, which is mandatory under Section 173 of BNSS, 2023.

7. COMPLAINT TO SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (If applicable):
   That the complainant, aggrieved by the refusal, lodged complaint with the Superintendent of Police, [District], under Section 175(3) of BNSS, 2023 on [Date].
   
   That despite the lapse of [number] days, no action has been taken by the police authorities.

8. NECESSITY FOR INVESTIGATION:
   That the matter requires immediate investigation to preserve evidence, record statements of witnesses, and ensure justice is not delayed or denied.
   
   That the delay in registration of FIR is prejudicing the complainant's right to justice and violating the mandate of Section 173 of BNSS, 2023.

9. COMPLIANCE WITH LALITA KUMARI JUDGMENT:
   That the present case does not fall under any of the exceptional categories mentioned in the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. (2014) 2 SCC 1, where preliminary inquiry is permissible.
   
   That the information clearly discloses commission of cognizable offence requiring immediate FIR registration.

10. COMPLIANCE WITH PRIYANKA SRIVASTAVA JUDGMENT:
    That the present complaint contains sufficient details about the alleged offence and satisfies the requirements laid down in Priyanka Srivastava v. State of U.P. (2015) 6 SCC 287.

11. NO CIVIL DISPUTE:
    That the present matter is not a civil dispute but involves clear commission of cognizable criminal offence under BNS, 2023.

12. PRAYER:
    In light of the above facts and circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:
    
    a) Take cognizance of the cognizable offence under Section(s) [BNS sections];
    
    b) Direct the Officer in Charge, [Police Station Name], to register FIR under Section 173 of BNSS, 2023 and investigate the matter in accordance with law;
    
    c) Direct the concerned police officer to submit Action Taken Report (ATR) within [specify time period] days;
    
    d) Pass any other order that this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice.

LIST OF WITNESSES:
1. [Name, Address]
2. [Name, Address]
3. [Name, Address]

LIST OF DOCUMENTS/ANNEXURES:
Annexure-1: Copy of written complaint submitted to police station dated [Date]
Annexure-2: Copy of complaint to SP under Section 175(3) dated [Date]
Annexure-3: [Any other supporting documents]
Annexure-4: Certificate under Section 63 of BSA, 2023 [if electronic evidence]

VERIFICATION:
I, [Complainant Name], son/daughter of [Father's Name], aged [Age] years, resident of [Address], do hereby solemnly affirm and verify that the contents of the above complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, nothing material has been concealed therefrom, and no part of it is false.

Verified at [Place] on this [Date] day of [Month], 20__.

                                                    [Signature]
                                                    Complainant

Place: [Place]
Date: [Date]
                

Supporting Documents to be Annexed

Document Type Purpose Mandatory/Optional
Written Complaint to Police Proves attempt to register FIR at police station Mandatory
Receipt/Acknowledgment Evidence of complaint submission to police If available
Complaint to SP under 175(3) Shows exhaustion of administrative remedy If applicable
Medical Reports Evidence of injury or medical condition If relevant
Photographs/Videos Visual evidence of offence or injury If available
Documentary Evidence Contracts, agreements, receipts, etc. If relevant
Electronic Evidence Certificate BSA Section 63 compliance for digital evidence If electronic evidence used
Witness Statements Corroborative evidence Optional but helpful

10. Landmark Case Laws on FIR Registration

The jurisprudence on FIR registration has evolved significantly through landmark judgments of the Supreme Court and various High Courts. Understanding these precedents is essential for both legal practitioners and citizens seeking to assert their rights.

Supreme Court Judgments

1. Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh & Others (2014)

(2014) 2 SCC 1 | AIR 2014 SC 187

Facts: Lalita Kumari's daughter disappeared, and police refused to register FIR, insisting on preliminary inquiry. The case reached Supreme Court examining the scope of Section 154 CrPC.

Key Holdings:

  • Registration of FIR is mandatory if information discloses commission of cognizable offence
  • Police officer has no discretion to conduct preliminary inquiry before FIR registration
  • The word "shall" in Section 154(1) makes FIR registration mandatory
  • Limited exceptions exist for specific categories: matrimonial disputes, commercial offences, medical negligence, corruption cases
  • Even in exception categories, if cognizable offence is clearly disclosed, FIR must be registered
  • Preliminary inquiry, if permitted, must be completed within seven days

Impact: This judgment remains the most authoritative pronouncement on FIR registration and continues to guide application of Section 173 BNSS, 2023.

2. Priyanka Srivastava & Another v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Others (2015)

(2015) 6 SCC 287 | AIR 2015 SC 1490

Facts: Concerning exercise of power by Magistrate under Section 156(3) CrPC [now Section 177(3) BNSS] to direct police investigation.

Key Holdings:

  • Magistrate's power under Section 156(3) can be exercised at pre-cognizance stage
  • Magistrate should apply judicial mind before directing investigation
  • The complaint should contain sufficient details about alleged offence
  • Magistrate should ordinarily conduct inquiry to ascertain if allegations prima facie disclose cognizable offence
  • Mechanical exercise of power should be avoided
  • The provision is meant to be a check on arbitrary police action

Impact: Established guidelines for judicial exercise of power in directing police investigation.

3. State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992)

1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 | AIR 1992 SC 604

Key Holdings:

  • High Court's inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC can be exercised to prevent abuse of process
  • FIR can be quashed if allegations do not constitute cognizable offence
  • Courts can intervene when FIR is filed with mala fide intent or amounts to abuse of process
  • Laid down seven categories of cases where inherent powers can be exercised

Relevance to BNSS: These principles apply to Section 495 of BNSS, 2023 (inherent powers).

4. Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014)

(2014) 8 SCC 273

Key Holdings:

  • Arrest should not be automatic in cases where offence is punishable with less than 7 years imprisonment
  • Police must follow guidelines before arrest
  • Notice to appear before police can be issued instead of immediate arrest

Relevance: While dealing with FIR registration, awareness of arrest guidelines prevents harassment.

5. Ramesh Kumari v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2006)

(2006) 2 SCC 677

Key Holdings:

  • Magistrate has power to direct investigation even before taking cognizance
  • The power under Section 156(3) is separate from power under Section 190
  • This power ensures police accountability

6. Sakiri Vasu v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2008)

(2008) 2 SCC 409

Key Holdings:

  • Zero FIR concept validated - FIR can be registered at any police station regardless of jurisdiction
  • Police station receiving information must register FIR and transfer it to jurisdictional police station
  • Refusal on grounds of jurisdiction is impermissible

Impact: Empowers citizens to register FIR at any police station, especially relevant for cyber crimes and emergencies.

Important High Court Judgments

7. Ashwani Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India (Delhi HC, 2021)

Key Observations:

  • Online FIR registration mechanism must be made available
  • Refusal to register FIR violates fundamental rights
  • Police accountability mechanisms must be strengthened

8. P. Sirajuddin v. State of Madras (Madras HC)

Key Holdings:

  • FIR is not an encyclopedia; details can be added during investigation
  • Minor discrepancies or lack of complete details cannot be ground for refusing FIR registration
  • The purpose of FIR is to set criminal law in motion, not to provide complete evidence

11. Special Considerations for Cyber Crimes

With the increasing prevalence of cyber crimes, understanding FIR registration procedures for digital offences is crucial. The BNSS 2023 and BNS 2023 have incorporated provisions to address cyber crime investigations more effectively.

Cyber Crime Offences Under BNS 2023

Cyber Crime Type BNS 2023 Section Nature
Identity Theft Section 318(4) Cognizable, Bailable
Online Cheating Section 318-320 Cognizable, Non-bailable (depending on amount)
Cyber Stalking Section 78 Cognizable, Bailable
Publishing Obscene Content Section 294 Cognizable, Bailable
Defamation (Online) Section 356 Non-Cognizable
Data Theft Section 303-305 Cognizable, Non-bailable
🌐 Important Note: Many cyber crimes also attract provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (as amended in 2008). Sections 43, 66, 66A, 66B, 66C, 66D, 66E, 66F, 67, 67A, 67B of IT Act provide specific cyber crime offences. These can be invoked along with BNS sections.

Where to Register Cyber Crime FIR

Documents Required for Cyber Crime FIR

βœ“ Essential Documentation for Cyber Crime FIR:

  • Screenshot Evidence: Screenshots of fraudulent messages, emails, websites, or social media posts
  • Transaction Details: Bank statements, transaction IDs, payment gateway details
  • Communication Records: Email headers, WhatsApp chats, SMS records
  • URLs and Links: Complete URLs of fraudulent websites or social media profiles
  • Account Details: Details of compromised accounts (email, social media, banking)
  • IP Address Information: If available from email headers or system logs
  • Certificate Under Section 63, BSA 2023: For electronic evidence admissibility
  • Identification Documents: Identity proof of complainant and witnesses

Special Provisions in BNSS 2023 for Cyber Crimes

⚠️ Time-Critical Action for Cyber Crimes: Digital evidence is often volatile and can be easily destroyed. Immediate FIR registration is crucial for:

  • Freezing compromised bank accounts
  • Preserving server logs and digital trails
  • Preventing further damage or data theft
  • Tracking perpetrators before they cover their tracks

12. CrPC vs BNSS: What Has Changed?

The transition from the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973 to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 represents a significant modernization of criminal procedural law. While core principles remain intact, several important changes affect FIR registration and investigation.

Aspect CrPC, 1973 BNSS, 2023 Impact
FIR Registration Section 154 Section 173 Core provisions retained; mandatory registration continues
Refusal Remedy - SP Section 154(3) Section 175(3) Procedural continuity; complaint to SP mechanism unchanged
Magistrate's Power Section 156(3) & 190 Section 177(3) & 193 Enhanced clarity on pre-cognizance powers
Electronic Evidence Limited provisions; relied on amendments Comprehensive recognition; explicit digital evidence framework Major advancement for cyber crimes and digital investigations
Online FIR Not explicitly provided Explicitly recognized and facilitated Enables remote FIR registration; improved accessibility
Zero FIR Judicially recognized concept Statutorily recognized Legal backing for FIR registration at any police station
Timeline for Investigation No specific timeline in many cases Prescribed timelines for investigation completion Ensures speedier investigation; reduces pendency
Victim Rights Limited explicit provisions Enhanced victim rights and protection mechanisms Victim-centric approach; better protection and information
Forensic Evidence Optional in most cases Mandatory forensic investigation for serious offences Scientific evidence strengthens prosecution
Video Recording Limited to specific statements Expanded use of audio-video recording Better evidence preservation; reduces manipulation

Key Innovations in BNSS 2023

  1. Digital Integration: Comprehensive provisions for handling digital evidence, online complaints, and electronic documentation
  2. Time-Bound Procedures: Specific timelines for various stages of investigation and trial to ensure speedy justice
  3. Victim Empowerment: Enhanced rights for victims including right to be heard, right to information, and right to participate in proceedings
  4. Technology Adoption: Explicit recognition of video conferencing, electronic summons, and digital case management
  5. Simplified Language: Removal of archaic terms; use of contemporary and accessible language

13. Practical Tips and Documentation

Before Approaching Police

βœ“ Preparation Checklist:

  • Gather all available evidence (documents, photographs, videos, receipts)
  • Prepare chronological timeline of events
  • Identify and list all witnesses with contact details
  • Determine applicable BNS sections (consult lawyer if needed)
  • Verify the offence is cognizable using First Schedule of BNSS
  • Keep multiple copies of all documents
  • For cyber crimes, take screenshots and preserve digital evidence
  • Obtain medical examination if applicable

During FIR Registration

If Police Refuse FIR

Action Plan for Refusal:

Document the Refusal
Note officer's name, badge number, reasons for refusal, date, and time. Record conversation if legally permissible.
Submit Written Complaint
Immediately submit written complaint at the police station. Send copy via registered post to SHO and keep proof.
Use Police Helplines
Call state police helpline, dial 100, or use police mobile apps to report refusal.
Approach Senior Officers
Meet or write to DCP/SP under Section 175(3) BNSS. Many police departments have dedicated grievance cells.
Legal Remedies
If administrative remedies fail, approach Judicial Magistrate under Section 177(3) BNSS with comprehensive complaint.
Seek Legal Assistance
Consult criminal lawyer for drafting complaint and representing before Magistrate.

Important Don'ts

⚠️ Things to Avoid:
  • Don't Accept "We'll Look Into It": Insist on written FIR registration, not verbal assurances
  • Don't Accept NCR Instead of FIR: Non-Cognizable Report (NCR) is not substitute for FIR in cognizable offences

This also provides a comprehensive overview of how to file a complaint under BNSS, with the Hon’ble Court of Magistrate.

Author: Adv (Dr.) Prashant Mali β™› [MSc(Comp Sci), LLM, Ph.D.] is a practicing lawyer with expertise in Cyber Crime and Electronic Evidence matters.
Email: prashant.mali@cyberlawconsulting.com