Conclusive Proof in the Indian Evidence Act and BSA

SHARE :

Conclusive proofs are considered final and cannot be rebutted by any evidence suggesting the contrary. SEC 4 of the Indian Evidence Act addresses "Conclusive Proof along with S2(b) of BSA."

Legal Aspects in Proving Facts

There are certain legal aspects to consider when proving the existence of certain facts. They are:

Proved
Disproved
Not proved
Conclusive proof

Section 4 of the Indian Evidence Act

Section 4 of the Indian Evidence Act states:

May presume
Shall presume
Conclusive proof

Understanding Conclusive Proof

"Conclusive of the one fact, regard the other as proved, and shall not allow evidence to be given for the purpose of disproving it."

In short, "if one fact is proved, there is no requirement to prove the existence of other coexisting facts."

Section 2(b) of BSA Defines "conclusive proof" means when one fact is declared by this Adhiniyam to be conclusive proof of another, the Court shall, on proof of the one fact, regard the other as proved, and shall not allow evidence to be given for the purpose of disproving it;

Examples of Conclusive Proof

Example 1: A child born to a woman before 145 days of divorce is considered the legitimate child of her former husband. There is no need to prove that such a child born after divorce is legitimate.

Example 2: 'A' flies from Mumbai to Delhi in an aircraft. Here, it is unnecessary to prove that 'A' stepped inside the aircraft after using the ladder. This fact is associated with the journey through the aircraft, and the defendant is estopped from denying this truth.

Example 3: Lightning itself is proven when we hear thunder from inside our home.

Illustrations of Conclusive Proof under the BSA

1. Digital Records
Example: A digitally signed contract or an electronic agreement authenticated using blockchain technology may be treated as conclusive proof of the terms agreed upon by the parties. BSA Implication: The BSA is expected to provide a framework for the authentication and admissibility of such digital records, ensuring they are treated as conclusive proof in legal proceedings.

2. Government-Issued Certificates
Example: A birth certificate issued by a government authority or a digital Aadhaar card may be treated as conclusive proof of identity or date of birth. BSA Implication: The BSA may explicitly state that such documents, when issued by authorized entities, are conclusive proof of the facts they attest to.

3. Bank Records
Example: Entries in bank ledgers or digital transaction records, when certified by the bank, may be treated as conclusive proof of financial transactions. BSA Implication: The BSA is likely to retain the principle that certified bank records are prima facie evidence of transactions, and in the absence of contrary evidence, they may be treated as conclusive proof.

4. Court Judgments
Example: A judgment of a court that has attained finality (res judicata) may be treated as conclusive proof of the facts decided in that case. BSA Implication: The BSA is expected to uphold the principle of res judicata, ensuring that final court judgments are treated as conclusive proof of the facts they adjudicate.

Summary

In short, conclusive proof is concrete and self-proven, with facts proven that are associated with it. The Court shall presume or may presume the existence of a certain fact. With conclusive proof, the court or any prudent person shall believe the existence of certain facts as true, with no need for additional evidence.

Principle: "IF ONE FACT IS PROVED, THE OTHER FACT ASSOCIATED WITH IT NEED NOT BE PROVED."

Case Reference: Asiya vs. Hameed (March 31, 2009)

Section 113 of the Indian Evidence Act prescribes that when a notification is issued in the Official Gazette regarding the cession of territory to a native state, it is considered as conclusive proof of a valid cession that occurred on the date mentioned in the notification. No evidence can disprove this final conclusion.

More Case Laws on Conclusive Proof

State of Bihar v. Kameshwar Singh (1952):

The Supreme Court held that when a statute declares a fact to be conclusive proof, no evidence can be admitted to contradict it. This principle is based on the idea of legislative intent and the finality of certain facts.

Union of India v. Moksh Builders & Financiers Ltd. (1977):

The court ruled that entries in government records, when declared as conclusive proof by law, cannot be challenged by any other evidence.

Indian Bank v. Satyam Fibres (India) Pvt. Ltd. (1996):

The Supreme Court held that bank statements, when certified by the bank, are considered prima facie evidence of transactions. If no contrary evidence is provided, they can be treated as conclusive proof.

R.M. Malkani v. State of Maharashtra (1973):

The court emphasized that tape recordings, when authenticated, can be treated as conclusive proof of conversations, provided they meet the standards of admissibility.

Difference Between Conclusive Proof and Conclusive Evidence

In the case of Smt. Sonawanti and others v. State of Punjab and others (MANU/SC/0034/1962), the Apex Court dismissed the distinction often drawn between 'conclusive proof' and 'conclusive evidence.' The Court observed that when a fact has been declared 'conclusive proof' by law, the court is precluded from considering any evidence to the contrary once the conclusion is established. Where a fact has been made conclusive proof of another fact, the court must proceed further, treating it as final.

Conversely, if a fact is designated 'conclusive evidence' of another, presenting contrary evidence is not necessarily barred. However, this argument was rejected, and it was declared that there is no difference between 'conclusive proof' and 'conclusive evidence'; both imply a final conclusion adopted by the court.

Comparison: Indian Evidence Act, 1872 vs Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA)

Aspect	Indian Evidence Act, 1872	Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA)
Scope of Evidence	Primarily focused on physical and documentary evidence.	Includes digital and electronic evidence as primary forms of evidence.
Conclusive Proof	Limited to traditional documents and records.	Expanded to include digital records and electronic documents.
Presumptions	Limited presumptions for electronic records.	Introduces new presumptions for digital evidence, such as the accuracy of electronic records created in the ordinary course of business.
Authentication	Relies on traditional methods of certification (e.g., signatures, seals).	Emphasizes digital authentication (e.g., blockchain, digital signatures).
Admissibility of Digital Evidence	Digital evidence is admissible but lacks a comprehensive framework.	Provides a clear framework for the admissibility and authentication of digital evidence.
Judicial Notice	Courts can take judicial notice of facts that are publicly known or documented.	Likely to expand judicial notice to include digital records and publicly available electronic data.
Modernization	Outdated and not fully equipped to handle modern technological advancements.	Designed to modernize evidence law, incorporating advancements in technology and addressing contemporary challenges.

Author: Adv (Dr.) Prashant Mali ♛ [MSc(Comp Sci), LLM, Ph.D.] is a practicing lawyer with expertise in Electronic Evidence matters.
Email: prashant.mali@cyberlawconsulting.com